Manage cookies
We use cookies to provide the best site experience.
Manage cookies
Cookie Settings
Cookies necessary for the correct operation of the site are always enabled.
Other cookies are configurable.
Essential cookies
Always On. These cookies are essential so that you can use the website and use its functions. They cannot be turned off. They're set in response to requests made by you, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms.
Analytics cookies
Disabled
These cookies collect information to help us understand how our Websites are being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customise our Websites for you. See a list of the analytics cookies we use here.
Advertising cookies
Disabled
These cookies provide advertising companies with information about your online activity to help them deliver more relevant online advertising to you or to limit how many times you see an ad. This information may be shared with other advertising companies. See a list of the advertising cookies we use here.
Solution: The challenge was addressed by implementing the RealMaint APM system from RCS-Systems, enabling the company’s specialists to perform reliability analysis on production assets, evaluate their actual technical condition, define maintenance and repair strategies, and automatically generate optimal maintenance and repair schedules, taking into account technological, financial, and resource constraints. This solution leveraged international methodologies like RCM, FMEA/FMECA, RCA, and PLA, as well as internally developed methods.

Enhancing Equipment Reliability: An Oil Company’s Success Story

Сhallenge: A leading oil company sought to reduce costs associated with unplanned and emergency equipment repairs and downtime, as well as lower maintenance and repair (M&R) expenses.
#RCM_and_Reliability
Result: By implementing optimized repair plans across all departments, the company achieved a 27% reduction in M&R costs, a 15% decrease in equipment downtime, and a 25% reduction in emergency losses.
Reduction in M&R
-27%
Reduction in equipment downtime
-15%
Reduction in emergency losse
-25%